Government Proposes Requiring Refugees to Repay Approximately £10,000 in Asylum Support Costs 

Home » Insights » Policy Update » Government Proposes Requiring Refugees to Repay Approximately £10,000 in Asylum Support Costs 

Individuals granted refugee status in the United Kingdom may be required to repay approximately £10,000 towards the cost of the accommodation and financial support provided to them during the determination of their asylum claim, under proposals announced by the Government. These measures form part of the forthcoming Immigration and Asylum Bill and are intended to recover costs from adults who possess sufficient means to do so. 

The Proposals 

Under the proposed scheme, asylum seekers who hold the right to work in the United Kingdom would be required to discharge the flat-rate charge before becoming eligible for settlement. Individuals whose claims are refused, and who subsequently leave the United Kingdom, would be required to repay any outstanding sum before being permitted to return. 

The precise sum has not been finalised, although it is expected to be set at approximately £10,000. The Home Office has not yet determined the income threshold at which liability for monthly repayments would arise. The Home Secretary would be granted the power to adjust both the repayment amount and the applicable threshold in future, with the Government stating that any such adjustment would be made to ensure the scheme remains fair to the taxpayer without placing any individual at risk of destitution. 

Government Rationale 

The Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, has stated that the proposals reflect the principle that the receipt of asylum support constitutes both a right and a responsibility, indicating that repayment would be expected of individuals once they are in a position to contribute. According to Home Office figures, approximately £4 billion of public expenditure was directed towards asylum accommodation and support in the preceding year. The average cost of housing an asylum seeker for one night in private-rented accommodation is £23.25, rising to £144 in hotel accommodation, while weekly subsistence payments range between £9.95 and £49.18 per individual. 

Concerns Raised by Stakeholders 

The Refugee Council has characterised the proposals as unfair and impractical, describing them as amounting to an additional financial burden on refugees that would impede their ability to rebuild their lives and achieve self-sufficiency. Imran Hussain, the organisation’s Director of External Affairs, has observed that the need for asylum support arises principally because asylum seekers are prohibited from working while their claims are under consideration, and that the proposed repayment obligation would therefore fall upon individuals who arrived in the United Kingdom without financial means. 

Further concerns have been raised regarding the practical yield of the scheme. Dr Madeleine Sumption, Director of the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford, has indicated that the proposals would move the immigration system in a more restrictive direction. She has noted that, in 2023, an estimated 13% of individuals granted refugee status five years previously were earning at least £20,000, suggesting that unless the repayment threshold were set significantly below the minimum wage, only a limited proportion of those granted asylum would earn sufficient income to make contributions under the scheme. Home Office data indicates that 24% of individuals aged sixteen to sixty-four granted asylum between 2015 and 2023 were in employment within their first year in the United Kingdom, rising to approximately 48% after two years. Of those in employment eight years after the grant of refugee status, 37% were engaged in full-time work, with median earnings of £23,000, and only 40% earning above the national minimum wage. 

Matters Yet to Be Determined 

A number of significant matters remain unresolved, including the income threshold at which repayment obligations would arise and the precise mechanism by which repayments would be administered. The Bill would additionally provide for the establishment of a new immigration appeals authority, intended to expedite the removal of individuals whose asylum claims have failed, together with changes to the application of human rights and modern slavery legislation, which the Government has stated are intended to address claims it regards as vexatious. It is anticipated that certain provisions of the Bill will be opposed by some Members of Parliament within the governing party. 

Conclusion 

The measures described above remain proposals contained within the forthcoming Immigration and Asylum Bill and do not currently form part of United Kingdom law. No changes to the legal position have yet taken effect. This firm will continue to monitor the progress of the Bill through Parliament and will provide further updates as additional detail becomes available. 

Excellence in Client Service
Excellence in Legal Knowledge
Excellence in Work Ethics

qcl Excellence Redefined is part of the

Learn more about MASB Group >

qcl Excellence Redefined

15 New Bridge Street
London EC4V 6AU
United Kingdom

+44 20 3523 0222

enquiry@qcl.co.uk

Follow us:

Reach out to us for a consultation.

Contact Us